Sex-Related Glycemic and Cardiovascular Responses with Different Types of Activity

man-vs-woman

Sex-related glycemic and cardiovascular responses in type 1 diabetes patients after aerobic exercise

by IDS Director of Exercise Physiology, Teen/Young Adult Specialist, Kathryn Gentile Alvarez

man-vs-woman

This study investigated sex-related glycemic and cardiovascular responses in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) after two types of 30-minute aerobic exercise sessions: interval aerobic exercise (IAE) and continuous aerobic exercise (CAE).

A total of 19 participants (10 women) completed the study, which measured heart rate, blood pressure, double product (cardiac workload), and blood glucose (BG) levels before (PRE), immediately after (POST-0), and 20 minutes after (POST-20) each session.

  • Men experienced significant reductions in BG levels after both CAE (at POST-0 and POST-20) and IAE (only at POST-0), with one hypoglycemic episode following IAE.
  • Women showed decreased BG levels after CAE at both POST-0 and POST-20, but not after IAE.
  • Cardiovascular responses, perceived exertion, and enjoyment levels were similar between exercise types and sexes, though men exhibited higher systolic blood pressure.
  • Overall, BG reductions were greater in men after CAE compared to IAE.
  • Men can choose either interval or continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) based on their pre-exercise blood glucose (BG) levels. However, starting a continuous session with lower blood glucose increases the risk of hypoglycemia. In contrast, for women, the prescription for interval aerobic exercise (IAE) and CAE can be the same, as our findings showed no differences in blood glucose levels between these exercise types.

The study suggests that sex-specific factors may influence exercise recommendations for individuals with T1DM, especially for men who may have irregular physical activity levels.

As the authors point out, this study has several limitations.

  1. First, while the volunteer groups were similar in anthropometric, clinical, and insulin delivery characteristics, assessing gas exchange ratios and hormone levels during and after the sessions would offer more insights into sex-specific glycemic and cardiovascular changes.
  2. Second, the menstrual cycle phase of female participants was not specifically evaluated, despite testing during a non-menstruation week.
  3. Third, capillary blood glucose (CBG), though commonly used, was measured alongside continuous glucose monitoring, and the VO2max estimation field test used may be less accurate than other methods.
  4. Additionally, the small sample size and lack of muscle mass assessment, a key factor in glucose uptake, are also limitations.

Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more robust insights and reliable recommendations.

Read the original article for more information.

Back to September 2024 NewsletterSign Up For The IDS Monthly Newsletter!

image_printPrint
Advertise Here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us:

Advertise Here
Frio-insulin-cooling-cases-coupon-code

More Newsletter Articles

View Past Newsletters:

We're the the clinical experts in DIABETES COACHING

Ready to take your Diabetes care to the next level? Schedule a talk with our team. We offer remote Diabetes Management, or if you’re looking for an in-person diabetes educator near Philadelphia, visit our office in Wynnewood, PA.

Group 9Created with Sketch.